Friday, 30 October 2015
Wednesday, 28 October 2015
Friday, 23 October 2015
Which is better; Traditional or Digital Art?
Real Artists should not discriminate, they should rather embrace the change that has come and see Computers as a tool to enhance their creative works and not as a threat.
Follow the link to watch how Mad Munchkin did justice to the topic : Which is better; Traditional or Digital Art?
Flinger Nose
Tuesday, 20 October 2015
Friday, 16 October 2015
Monday, 12 October 2015
THE NEXT JOKER WOULD LIKELY BE A FEMALE ONE, says Bruno Heller
BY Lucas Siegel
@ComicBook
Gotham's Bruno Heller: "We’ve Absolutely Considered The Possibility Of A Female Joker"
SPOILERS Ahead for last night's episode of Gotham, "The Last Laugh!"
Yes, despite his expert protrayal at the hands of Cameron Monaghan,
who seemed to take the best of multiple Jokers and put them into the
character of Jerome, the young man with the sadistic laugh died last
night on Gotham. The character, then, serves to inspire the next attempt - or two or five or ten attempts - at becoming the ultimate villain.
When discussing the death of Jerome with Gotham showrunner Bruno Heller,
though, we had to ask about the ComicBook.com theory that Barbara Kean
could, in fact, become The Joker on the series. After all, Heller has
said in the past that The Joker would be inspired by other people, and
Barbara worked very closely with Jerome these last few episodes. She
even commented to mastermind Theo Galavan, "I don’t know, the kid had a
way about him" when he mentioned Jerome's whole modus operandi.
At the end of a phone interview with Heller, I asked about the
theory. The writer and producer known for his candid nature gave a
still-somehow-surprisingly-candid response: It's completely feasible.
Aside from the evidence already on Gotham,
and the last three weeks of additional support for the theory about
Barbara, there is some comic book support as well. If you think of Gotham as an alternate reality to the main DC Comics world, in another alternate reality, Flashpoint,
there was already a female Joker. In that world, Bruce Wayne was killed
in the alley, driving his father Thomas to become Batman and his mother
Martha to become The Joker. Also, Barbara Kean has historically had
some mental instability in the comics, and the son of her and Jim Gordon
has gone on to be a sadistic killer in his own right.
Here is Bruno Heller's response to the theory - and even the possibilty of a female Joker - in full:
Source : Comicbook.com
To Read More of Bruno Heller's Theory In full, Click :
Saturday, 10 October 2015
PAINT MAKING
We all love colors, some even like to paint with
them. But ever wondered how our favorite colors are made? Well this article
focuses on the various techniques on their manufacturing process.
This page discusses standard paint ingredients and manufacturing methods. The material is presented in four sections: (1) the ingredients and recipes used to make watercolor paints, (2) the generic historical and modern pigments that provide the color in paints; (3) the manufacture of modern pigments; and (4) the manufacture of watercolor paints.
Information on these topics is
scattered across a wide range of sources, from chemical engineering texts to
art conservation studies. In some cases I was only able to obtain information
by querying experts or manufacturers directly. Each source has its own
perspective and professional traditions, and they sometimes disagree on
specifics. I've made editorial judgments based on all the facts I could gather,
and regret any inaccuracies that remain.
Wednesday, 7 October 2015
PITCHING A BRILLIANT IDEA
Coming up with creative ideas is easy; selling them to
strangers is hard. All too often, entrepreneurs, sales executives, and
marketing managers go to great lengths to show how their new business plans or
creative concepts are practical and high margin—only to be rejected by
corporate decision makers who don’t seem to understand the real value of the
ideas. Why does this happen?
It turns out that the problem has as much to do with
the seller’s traits as with an idea’s inherent quality. The person on the
receiving end tends to gauge the pitcher’s creativity as well as the proposal
itself. And judgments about the pitcher’s ability to come up with workable
ideas can quickly and permanently overshadow perceptions of the idea’s worth.
We all like to think that people judge us carefully and objectively on our
merits. But the fact is, they rush to place us into neat little categories—they
stereotype us. So the first thing to realize when you’re preparing to make a
pitch to strangers is that your audience is going to put you into a box. And
they’re going to do it really fast. Research suggests that humans can
categorize others in less than 150 milliseconds. Within 30 minutes, they’ve
made lasting judgments about your character.
These insights emerged from my lengthy study of the
$50 billion U.S. film and television industry. Specifically, I worked with 50
Hollywood executives involved in assessing pitches from screenwriters. Over the
course of six years, I observed dozens of 30-minute pitches in which the
screenwriters encountered the “catchers” for the first time. In interviewing
and observing the pitchers and catchers, I was able to discern just how quickly
assessments of creative potential are made in these high-stakes exchanges. (The
deals that arise as a result of successful screenplay pitches are often
multimillion-dollar projects, rivaling in scope the development of new car
models by Detroit’s largest automakers and marketing campaigns by New York’s
most successful advertising agencies.) To determine whether my observations
applied to business settings beyond Hollywood, I attended a variety of
product-design, marketing, and venture-capital pitch sessions and conducted
interviews with executives responsible for judging creative, high-stakes ideas
from pitchers previously unknown to them. In those environments, the results
were remarkably similar to what I had seen in the movie business.
People on the receiving end of pitches have no formal,
verifiable, or objective measures for assessing that elusive trait, creativity.
Catchers—even the expert ones—therefore apply a set of subjective and often inaccurate
criteria very early in the encounter, and from that point on, the tone is set.
If a catcher detects subtle cues indicating that the pitcher isn’t creative,
the proposal is toast. But that’s not the whole story. I’ve discovered that
catchers tend to respond well if they are made to feel that they are
participating in an idea’s development.
The pitchers who do this successfully are those who
tend to be categorized by catchers into one of three prototypes. I call them
the showrunner, the artist, and the neophyte. Showrunners come off as
professionals who combine creative inspiration with production know-how.
Artists appear to be quirky and unpolished and to prefer the world of creative
ideas to quotidian reality. Neophytes tend to be—or act as if they were—young,
inexperienced, and naive. To involve the audience in the creative process,
showrunners deliberately level the power differential between themselves and
their catchers; artists invert the differential; and neophytes exploit it. If
you’re a pitcher, the bottom-line implication is this: By successfully
projecting yourself as one of the three creative types and getting your catcher
to view himself or herself as a creative collaborator, you can improve your
chances of selling an idea.
My research also has implications for those who buy
ideas: Catchers should beware of relying on stereotypes. It’s all too easy to
be dazzled by pitchers who ultimately can’t get their projects off the ground,
and it’s just as easy to overlook the creative individuals who can make good on
their ideas. That’s why it’s important for the catcher to test every pitcher, a
matter we’ll return to in the following pages.
The Sorting Hat
In the late 1970s, psychologists Nancy Cantor and
Walter Mischel, then at Stanford University, demonstrated that we all use sets
of stereotypes—what they called “person prototypes”—to categorize strangers in
the first moments of interaction. Though such instant typecasting is arguably
unfair, pattern matching is so firmly hardwired into human psychology that only
conscious discipline can counteract it.
Yale University creativity researcher Robert Sternberg
contends that the prototype matching we use to assess originality in others
results from our implicit belief that creative people possess certain
traits—unconventionality, for example, as well as intuitiveness, sensitivity,
narcissism, passion, and perhaps youth. We develop these stereotypes through
direct and indirect experiences with people known to be creative, from
personally interacting with the 15-year-old guitar player next door to hearing
stories about Pablo Picasso.
When a person we don’t know pitches an idea to us, we
search for visual and verbal matches with those implicit models, remembering
only the characteristics that identify the pitcher as one type or another. We
subconsciously award points to people we can easily identify as having creative
traits; we subtract points from those who are hard to assess or who fit
negative stereotypes.
In hurried business situations in which executives
must evaluate dozens of ideas in a week, or even a day, catchers are rarely
willing to expend the effort necessary to judge an idea more objectively. Like
Harry Potter’s Sorting Hat, they classify pitchers in a matter of seconds. They
use negative stereotyping to rapidly identify the no-go ideas. All you have to
do is fall into one of four common negative stereotypes, and the pitch session
will be over before it has begun. (For more on these stereotypes, see the
sidebar “How to Kill Your Own Pitch.”) In fact, many such sessions are strictly
a process of elimination; in my experience, only 1% of ideas make it beyond the
initial pitch.
Sunday, 4 October 2015
Friday, 2 October 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)